WHAT THE LAW OFFICE CLIENT’S ARE SAYING:
2014 client: “I can honestly say that Ms. Schmidt is one of the most professional attorneys I have ever spoken with. My case was a massive undertaking for any attorney because it included 4 states and a DUI from over a decade ago. One state that had no jurisdiction regarding the matter was holding my drivers license hostage in the state I currently live in which neither had anything to do with the original infraction. Laurie and her team were able to get this issue handled within a week. I would highly recommend her services to anyone looking for an attorney. I cannot thank her enough for the help.”
2013 client: “I would just like to thank and highly recommend Ms. Schmidt for legal counsel. She was able to work with me on short notice and save me from larger penalties and jail time. She was direct and researched several options in my defense and proceed with the best viable option.”
Denver based client: “Laurie Schmidt is amazing. Just like her website says, time is of the essence. I called Laurie because I suspected the city was developing a case against me. Laurie was able to turn around my situation by counseling me on what to say, how to say it and what my rights are. The cards are now in my favor. I couldn’t be more happy.”
Denver based client: “I went to see Laurie as I received a letter from an attorney threatening legal action against me for complaints I made. Laurie scheduled me the same day I called and spent more than an hour with me during the free initial consultation. When I arrived the reception staff greeted me in a professional manner and showed me directly to the conference room. Laurie provided much more than free legal advice and assured me of the protection provided to me under the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. During the initial consultation Laurie gave me all the information I needed to respond effectively to the letter on my own but also gave me the option to have her respond. I chose to have Laurie respond and her response has been more than I could have ever expected. I am a very small client but have been given big client 5 Star Service.”
NOTABLE CASE RESULTS
CASE RESULTS DISCLAIMER: ALL CASE RESULTS ARE DEPENDENT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE SPECIFIC SITUATION. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE NOR SHOULD THERE BE AN EXPECTATION THAT A SIMILAR RESULT WOULD BE OBTAINED IN YOU OR YOUR LOVED ONE’S CASE.
MARIJUANA DUI CASES
Defendant charged with Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana – won the jury trial, client was found not guilty and suffered no license consequences;
Defendant charged with Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana – successfully obtain a reduction in all charges to a non-DUI offense without any probation
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES
Defendant charged with several counts of domestic violence assault – dismissed by prosecution by establishing to prosecution that officer investigation was biased and flawed
Defendant charged with one count of domestic violence – first offense, obtained dismissal without diversion by establishing doubt as to charges in mind of prosecuting attorney
Pre-filing case- domestic violence – able to avoid filing charges by showing bias in police investigation
Defendant charged with one count of assault on a current girlfriend-first offense, obtained a not guilty verdict after jury trial and case was dismissed.
Defendant charged with one count of assault, one count of false imprisonment, one count of harassment with a domestic violence enhancer, not guilty on all charges, case dismissed.
Obtained favorable disposition for first offense DUI after successful pre-trial motion limiting prosecutions evidence
Obtained set-aside (no DMV suspension) for DUI in DMV hearing by showing faulty intoxilyzer results could not be relied upon.
DUI over a .08 and vehicle code violations reduced to a reckless driving without any alcohol terms and/or consequences with license
Misdemeanor theft charges – dismissed by showing government attorney that case was not provable beyond a reasonable doubt.
Felony Theft Case- not guilty verdict obtained after jury trial. The allegation of theft involved a high dollar amount and allegation of a sophisticated scheme
Municipal assault case – dismissed by showing improper show-up or identification of client violated client’s due process rights
Resisting Arrest and Obstructing an Officer – not guilty verdict obtained after jury trial
Assault on an officer, Resisting Arrest, and Obstructing an Officer – not guilty verdict obtained